Case summary This case is about how courts approach credibility analysis in sexual assault cases. In this case, the complainant alleged that she was sexually assaulted by the accused while she was affected by alcohol consumption. At the BC Supreme Read More
Hansman v Neufeld [2022]
Case summary This case is about the proper interpretation and application of BC’s Protection of Public Participation Act (PPPA). The PPPA was enacted to stop corporations and people with power from using the legal system to silence those who Read More
R. v Ellis [2022]
Case Summary R. v Ellis is about whether a sentencing range of 18-to-36 months of jail is appropriate for drug users who sell small amounts of fentanyl at the street level as a means of ensuring their own supply Read More
Single Mothers’ Alliance v BC: Taking the fight for family law legal aid to court
Family justice not family violence In BC, most applications for family law legal aid are denied outright or the legal support provided is insufficient to achieve any meaningful resolution. As a result, many people fleeing family violence are faced Read More
Barendregt v Grebliunas [2021]
Case summary This case is about when and how an appeal court can consider new information when deciding an appeal of a family law decision. From a bigger picture perspective, it is also about how deferential (respectful) appeal courts Read More
R. v Kirkpatrick [2021]
Case summary This case is about whether the Criminal Code recognizes that a person can consent to sex on the condition that their partner wears a condom. When a person insists on condom use, does their partner commit sexual Read More
T.L. v the Attorney General of BC et al. [2021]
Case summary This case is about the constitutionality of s. 96 of BC’s child welfare legislation, the Child, Family, and Community Service Act. Under s. 96, a director (i.e., a representative of the Minister of Children and Family Development) Read More
R. v J.J., A.S. v Her Majesty the Queen, et al. [2021]
Case summary R. v J.J. This case is about the constitutionality of certain rules of evidence in criminal sexual assault cases. The rules in question—ss. 278.92 to 278.94 of the Criminal Code—limit the ability of an accused person to use Read More